4.3 Article

Bicarbonate uptake experiment show potential karst carbon sinks transformation into carbon sequestration by terrestrial higher plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT INTERACTIONS
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 419-426

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2022.2045369

Keywords

Carbon neutrality; inorganic carbon; photosynthesis; isotope tracer technique; carbon dissolution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1612441-2]
  2. Support Plan Projects of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province [(2021)YB453]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides direct evidence of the transformation of karst carbon sinks into carbon sequestrations by terrestrial higher plants, and explores the adaptive differences of plants in karst environments and their regulation of the entire carbon cycle.
Karstification forms tremendous karst carbon sinks in the Earth. Whether terrestrial higher plants can absorb and utilize bicarbonate, there is a key testimony that karst carbon sinks can be transformed into carbon sequestrations by terrestrial higher plants. The uptake and use of root-derived bicarbonate, photosynthesis, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase contents of Broussonetia papyrifera (Bp) and Morus alba L. (Ma) were measured. This study provides the most direct and primary evidence for the transformation using the bidirectional isotope tracer technique. The transformation may result from the synergism in the absorption and utilization of photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic pathway, and simultaneously strengthen karst carbon sink and carbon sequestrations of plants, while it had no effect on photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves. Differences in the transformation result in the discrepancies of Bp and Ma in the adaptation to karst environments. Karst-adaptable plants can more regulate the entire carbon cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available