4.6 Article

Effectiveness of innovative instructional module for professional competence in health literacy in medical students

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03252-7

Keywords

Health literacy; Professional competence; Medical education; Medical student

Funding

  1. Taiwan's Ministry of Science and. Technology research project [107-2511-H-003-051-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effects of an innovative instructional module on medical students' professional competence in health literacy. The results showed that the experimental group who received the innovative instruction demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge, attitude, and skill related to health literacy.
Background: Physicians should be equipped with professional competence in health literacy to communicate more effectively with patients with limited health literacy. However, the health literacy curriculum has not yet been refined globally, and is scarce in Taiwan's medical education. We implemented an innovative instructional module to attain professional competence in health literacy among medical students and investigated its effects. Methods: We adopted a quasi-experimental design and recruited 204 fifth-year Taiwanese medical students between December 2019 and May 2020. Participants who worked as clerks at the Department of Family Medicine of three medical schools in northern Taiwan were assigned to the experimental group through convenience sampling. A total of 98 students received a three-hour innovative instruction, including medical simulation videos, role-playing, and board games. Both the experimental and control groups completed the online pre-test and mail-in post-test. A generalized estimating equation was applied to measure the effects of the intervention. Results: There was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of professional competence in health literacy in all three aspects. In terms of knowledge, the experimental group improved 12% more than the control group (beta=0.12, 95% CI: 0.05 similar to 0.19, p =0.001). In terms of attitude, the experimental group improved by an average of 0.27 more points per question than the control group (beta=0.27, 95% CI: 0.08 similar to 0.46, p = 0.007). As for skill, the experimental group improved by an average of 0.35 more points per question than the control group (beta=0.35, 95% CI: 0.14 similar to 0.55, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The proposed innovative instructional module significantly improved fifth-year medical students' professional competence in health literacy, which is expected to benefit their future medical practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available