4.6 Article

Smarter greener cities through a social-ecological-technological systems approach

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101168

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SMARTer Greener Cities project through the Nordforsk Sustainable Urban Development and Smart Cities program [95377]
  2. US National Science Foundation [1934933, 1444755, 1927167]
  3. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  4. Office Of The Director [1927167] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smart city development is expanding rapidly, but often overlooks critical interactions between social and ecological components, limiting its real impact. By drawing on SETS literature and framing, the impact of smart city agendas can be expanded to address sustainability issues and considerations of equity, power, agency, and ecological resilience.
Smart city development is expanding rapidly globally and is often argued to improve urban sustainability. However, these smart developments are often technology-centred approaches that can miss critical interactions between social and ecological components of urban systems, limiting their real impact. We draw on the social-ecological-technological systems (SETS) literature and framing to expand and improve the impact of smart city agendas. A more holistic systems framing can ensure that `smart' solutions better address sustainability broadly and extend to issues of equity, power, agency, nature-based solutions and ecological resilience. In this context, smart city infrastructure plays an important role in enabling new ways of measuring, experiencing and engaging with local and temporal dynamics of urban systems. We provide a series of examples of subsystems interactions, or `couplings', to illustrate how a SETS approach can expand and enhance smart city infrastructure and development to meet normative societal goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available