4.5 Article

Association between work-related psychological empowerment and quality of nursing care among critical care nurses

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 2015-2022

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13641

Keywords

critical care nurses; quality of nursing care; work-related empowerment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the association between work-related psychological empowerment and quality of nursing care in Jordanian critical care nurses. The results showed a positive relationship between quality of nursing care and psychological empowerment, indicating the need to enhance work psychological empowerment to improve the quality of nursing care.
Aim This study aimed to examine the association between work-related psychological empowerment and quality of nursing care in Jordanian critical care nurses. Background Nurses' work-related empowerment is the essential element to enhance nurses' quality of care. There are few studies about this area among critical care nurses. Methods A cross-sectional design was used, and data were collected from critical care registered nurses (N = 480) from different health sectors. Results The mean scores of work-related psychological empowerment and quality of nursing care were 5.22 (SD = 0.92) and 3.75 (SD = 0.62), respectively. The nurses had agreement level of psychological empowerment and very good level of quality of nursing care. There was a positive relationship between quality of nursing care and psychological empowerment. Conclusion The need to enhance work psychological empowerment is necessary to improve quality of nursing care. Implication for Nursing Management The results reflect the need for policy-makers and nursing managers to develop and implement strategies to promote psychological empowerment to provide high quality of nursing care among critical care nurses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available