4.2 Review

Resting-state Networks in Tinnitus A Scoping Review

Journal

CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 903-922

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01170-1

Keywords

Subjective tinnitus; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Brain imaging; Neural networks; Auditory network; Review

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR BRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review provides an overview of resting-state fMRI studies in chronic subjective tinnitus patients. It identifies alterations in various resting-state networks, such as the auditory network, default mode network, attention networks, and visual network. However, the lack of reproducibility in the field may be attributed to the use of different regions of interest and analytical methods, as well as the heterogeneity of tinnitus. Future studies should focus on replication using the same regions of interest and controlling for potential confounds, in order to potentially identify a biomarker for tinnitus.
Chronic subjective tinnitus is the constant perception of a sound that has no physical source. Brain imaging studies show alterations in tinnitus patients' resting-state networks (RSNs). This scoping review aims to provide an overview of resting-state fMRI studies in tinnitus, and to evaluate the evidence for changes in different RSNs. A total of 29 studies were included, 26 of which found alterations in networks such as the auditory network, default mode network, attention networks, and visual network; however, there is a lack of reproducibility in the field which can be attributed to the use of different regions of interest and analytical methods per study, and tinnitus heterogeneity. Future studies should focus on replication by using the same regions of interest in their analysis of resting-state data, and by controlling adequately for potential confounds. These efforts could potentially lead to the identification of a biomarker for tinnitus in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available