4.5 Article

Geometric correction of satellite stereo images by DEM matching without ground control points and map projection step: tested on Cartosat-1 images

Journal

EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 1183-1199

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-022-00799-3

Keywords

High resolution satellite images; Rational function coefficients; bias correction; DEM matching; No-GCP approach; Map projection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a bias correction method for RPCs of satellite stereo images without GCPs, using global DEMs as control information and developing new formulae given directly in geodetic longitude and latitude format instead of Cartesian map projection coordinates. Experiment results show significant improvement in geopositioning accuracy and RMS improvement in longitude, latitude, and height.
Ground Control Points (GCPs) are needed in most geometric processing of satellite images. Generally used geometric model is based on the use of rational polynomials. The Coefficients of Rational Polynomials (RPCs) are provided by image vendors which are contaminated by some biases. In this paper, a no-GCP bias correction method for RPCs of satellite stereo images is introduced. The method uses global DEMs as ground control information: First, a point cloud is generated from stereo pair, then using the DEM matching strategy it is aligned to the global DEM for estimation of 3D rigid transformation parameters. This transformation is performed with our originally developed method which separates three planimetric parameters from three leveling parameters. They are then employed for bias correction in object space. For DEM matching and also for bias correction, we developed new formulae given directly in geodetic longitude and latitude format, instead of Cartesian map projection coordinates. Numerical results of this research are reported in two categories: with or without (1) GCPs and (2) map projection step. Experiments on two Cartosat-1 stereo pairs show in category (1), improvement in geopositioning accuracy from 399.2 m and 124.0 m to 7.6 m and 2.6 m, respectively. In category (2), we observed RMS improvement in both datasets and in all components up to 3.1 m in longitude, 6.8 m in latitude and 1.2 m in height.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available