4.6 Article

Gut dysbiosis and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth as independent forms of gut microbiota disorders in cirrhosis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1067

Keywords

Dysbiosis; Gut-liver axis; Microbiome; Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; Cirrhosis; Microbiota

Funding

  1. Biocodex Microbiota Foundation: National Research Grant Russia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found a relationship between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and gut dysbiosis in patients with cirrhosis. Patients with SIBO had higher levels of Firmicutes and Fusobacteria, and lower levels of Bacteroidetes compared to patients without SIBO. However, gut dysbiosis and SIBO are likely independent disorders in cirrhosis.
BACKGROUND & nbsp;Gut dysbiosis and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) are commonly observed in patients with cirrhosis. Despite the substantial number of articles describing the relations between disorders of gut microbiota and various manifestations of cirrhosis, dysbiosis and SIBO were always studied separately.& nbsp;AIM & nbsp;To study the relationship of gut dysbiosis and SIBO in cirrhosis.& nbsp;METHODS & nbsp;This observational study included 47 in-patients with cirrhosis. Stool microbiome was assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. SIBO was assessed using the lactulose hydrogen breath test.& nbsp;RESULTS & nbsp;SIBO was found in 24/47 (51.1%) patients. Patients with SIBO had a higher abundance of Firmicutes (P = 0.017) and Fusobacteria (P = 0.011), and a lower abundance of Bacteroidetes (P = 0.013) than patients without SIBO. This increase in the abundance of Firmicutes occurred mainly due to an increase in the abundance of bacteria from the genus Blautia (P = 0.020) of the Lachnospiraceae family (P = 0.047), while the abundance of other major families of this phylum [Ruminococcaceae (P = 0.856), Peptostreptococcaceae (P = 0.066), Clostridiaceae (P = 0.463), Eubacteriaceae (P = 0.463), Lactobacillaceae (P = 0.413), and Veillonellaceae (P = 0.632)] did not differ significantly between the patients with and without SIBO. Reduced level of Bacteroidetes in samples from patients with SIBO was a result of the decrease in bacterial numbers from all the major families of this phylum [Bacteroidaceae (P = 0.014), Porphyromonadaceae (P = 0.002), and Rikenellaceae (P = 0.047)], with the exception of Prevotellaceae (P = 0.941). There were no significant differences in the abundance of taxa that were the main biomarkers of cirrhosis-associated gut dysbiosis [Proteobacteria (P = 0.790), Bacilli (P = 0.573), Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.632), Streptococcaceae (P = 0.170), Staphylococcaceae (P = 0.450), and Enterococcaceae (P = 0.873)] between patients with and without SIBO.& nbsp;CONCLUSION & nbsp;Despite the differences observed in the gut microbiome between patients with and without SIBO, gut dysbiosis and SIBO are most likely independent disorders of gut microbiota in cirrhosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available