4.7 Article

Estimating Soil Water Retention Curve by Extreme Learning Machine, Radial Basis Function, M5 Tree and Modified Group Method of Data Handling Approaches

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021WR031059

Keywords

extreme learning machine; modified group method of data handling; M5 tree; pedotransfer functions; radial basis function; soil water retention curve

Funding

  1. Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK) [BBS/E/C/000I0310]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the performance of different neural network methods and the M5 tree method in predicting the soil water retention curve in Iran, finding that RBF-based PTFs performed better in terms of the IRMSE criterion, and the developed PTFs and methods were more reliable than those by other researchers.
This study was conducted to assess the applicability of novel types of neural network methods (extreme learning machine (ELM), radial basis function (RBF), modified group method of data handling (M-GMDH)) and M5 tree methods for the prediction of the soil water retention curve (SWRC) and compare their performance with that of derived methods and pedotransfer functions (PTFs) of other studies for soils in Iran. Then, 15 PTFs were developed. Predictions were evaluated by the integral root mean square error (IRMSE), integral mean error (IME), Akaike's information criterion (AIC), and coefficient of determination (R-2). The RBF-based PTFs were better than the M5 tree, M-GMDH, and ELM-based PTFs in terms of the IRMSE criterion in the testing step. Also, PTFs and methods developed in the present study were more reliable than other derived PTFs and methods by different researchers. The values of the IRMSE and R-2 in the best PTFs (with inputs of sand, clay, total porosity and the moisture content at field capacity and permanent wilting point) of the testing data set of the RBF method were 0.037 cm(3)cm(-3) and 0.988, respectively. For the testing data set, the average values of the IRMSE criterion for all the PTFs of the RBF, ELM, M-GMDH, and M5 tree methods were 0.051, 0.062, 0.055, and 0.054 cm(3)cm(-3), respectively. Therefore, the differences were considerable only between the ELM and other methods. The IRMSE criterion results of the testing data set showed the suitability of the RBF method in the development of PTFs for the prediction of the SWRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available