Power relations in the co-creation of water policy in Bolivia: beyond the tyranny of participation

Integrated water management is complex and requires the participation of diverse actors to identify and implement transformative solutions. However, power relations can obstruct the more inclusive and equitable experiences of participatory approaches, hence limiting the empowerment of vulnerable groups. It is thus important to study how power relations are influenced by people's interests, socio-political structures, and knowledge in the process of (co)creation of water policies. We use a case study in a rural municipality of Bolivia to address this issue. Qualitative data were collected between 2017 and 2020 and analysed using the elements of the Power Cube of Gaventa as the analytical framework. Results confirm that different factors influence power relations in the making of a water policy such as interests, access to information, habits, and customs. Actors use different forms, spaces, and levels of power to achieve their interests. Our results show the importance and need to analyse power relations prior, during and after the (co)creation of any public policy and to step away from linear and sectoral frameworks of policy development.

Automated summary

Integrated water management requires diverse participation, but power relations can hinder inclusivity and equity. A case study in Bolivia reveals that factors like interests, information access, habits, and customs influence power relations in water policy-making. It is therefore important to analyze power relations before, during, and after policy creation, moving away from linear and sectoral approaches.