4.6 Article

Explaining away results in more robust visual tracking

Journal

VISUAL COMPUTER
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 2081-2095

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-022-02466-6

Keywords

Object tracking; Tracking-by-Detection trackers; Distractor submission; Explaining away

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel tracking architecture that increases robustness by considering both the appearance of the tracked object and the appearance of detected distractors in previous frames using explaining away inference. The proposed method, when combined with various existing trackers, improves tracking accuracy and achieves competitive performance on popular benchmarks.
Many current trackers utilise an appearance model to localise the target object in each frame. However, such approaches often fail when there are similar-looking distractor objects in the surrounding background, meaning that target appearance alone is insufficient for robust tracking. In contrast, humans consider the distractor objects as additional visual cues, in order to infer the position of the target. Inspired by this observation, this paper proposes a novel tracking architecture in which not only is the appearance of the tracked object, but also the appearance of the distractors detected in previous frames, taken into consideration using a form of probabilistic inference known as explaining away. This mechanism increases the robustness of tracking by making it more likely that the target appearance model is matched to the true target, rather than similar-looking regions of the current frame. The proposed method can be combined with many existing trackers. Combining it with SiamFC, DaSiamRPN, Super_DiMP, and ARSuper_DiMP all resulted in an increase in the tracking accuracy compared to that achieved by the underlying tracker alone. When combined with Super_DiMP and ARSuper_DiMP, the resulting trackers produce performance that is competitive with the state of the art on seven popular benchmarks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available