Journal
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.010
Keywords
Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Sextant biopsy; Targeted biopsy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared prostate cancer detection on T-Bx and S-Bx and found that detection on T-Bx was associated with larger tumor volume and worse prognosis. However, simultaneous tumor detection on S-Bx in patients with prostate cancer on T-Bx did not have a significant clinicopathologic impact.
Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (T-Bx) has been shown to more accurately detect clinically significant prostate cancer. However, the clinical significance of cancer detection on T-Bx, followed by definitive treatment, needs to be further investigated. We herein investigated unique cohorts of patients with prostate cancer detected on systematic sextant biopsy (S-Bx) and/or T-Bx. Materials and methods: We assessed consecutive patients who had undergone T-Bx with concurrent S-Bx (6 sites, >= 12 cores), followed by radical prostatectomy from 2015 to 2019. Within our Surgical Pathology database, we identified a total of 222 men who met the inclusion criteria for prostatic adenocarcinoma on either S-Bx or T-Bx, or both (B-Bx). Radical prostatectomy findings and oncologic outcomes were then compared among groups. Results: Prostate cancer was detected on S-Bx only (n = 32; 14%), T-Bx only (n = 40; 18%), or B-Bx (n = 150; 68%). Compared to cases with cancer detected on S-Bx only, those on T-Bx only or B-Bx showed significantly higher tumor grade (highest Grade Group in each patient) on biopsy and significantly larger estimated tumor volume on prostatectomy. There were no significant differences in tumor volume on biopsy, tumor grade on prostatectomy (except S-Bx vs. B-Bx), pT or pN stage category, surgical margin status, or preoperative prostate-specific antigen level between cases where cancer was detected on S-Bx only vs. T-Bx only or B-Bx. There were also no significant differences in any of these clinicopathologic features between cancers detected on T-Bx only vs. B-Bx. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy in patients whose cancer was detected on T-Bx only (P = 0.020) or B-Bx (P = 0.032) than in those on S-Bx only. No significant difference in recurrence-free survival between T-Bx only vs. B-Bx cases (P = 0.601) was seen. In multivariate analysis, cancer detection on T-Bx only (vs. S-Bx only) showed significance for recurrence (hazard ratio = 8.482, P = 0.045). Conclusions: Detection of prostate cancer on T-Bx, in addition to or instead of S-Bx, was found to be associated with larger tumor volume as well as worse prognosis. However, no significant clinicopathologic impact of simultaneous tumor detection on S-Bx was indicated in patients with prostate cancer present on T-Bx. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available