4.7 Article

Urban greenspace access, uses, and values: A case study of user perceptions in metropolitan ravine parks

Journal

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127522

Keywords

Access; Ecosystem services; Forest; Greenspace; Park; Perceptions; Urban; User; Values; Ravine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban greenspaces provide critical ecosystem services to residents, with cultural ecosystem services being the most prominent. Understanding greenspace users' perspectives is important for park planners to address their preferences, concerns, and potential conflicts. This study conducted a survey, park audit, and qualitative analysis in Toronto's ravine parks, revealing a wide variation in user characteristics and values. Conflicts between users with different values and expectations were also identified. The findings and recommendations from this case study can be valuable for similar forested, urban greenspaces.
Urban greenspaces provide critical ecosystem services to urban area residents. While urban greenspaces provide a range of ecosystem services, cultural ecosystem services may be the most prominent to residents. Cultural ecosystem services provide benefits through educational, recreational, social, and spiritual opportunities. More knowledge is required about greenspace users' perspectives of their local greenspaces, which will enrich park planners' knowledge of the preferences, concerns, and potential points of conflict that greenspace users experience. To help increase this knowledge, we conducted a survey with closed and open-ended questions and supported it with a park audit and photographic evidence. As a case study, data were collected in six ravine parks in the City of Toronto, Canada. Ravine parks were of particular interest as they are a unique form of socioecological greenspace that have varied management goals which on occasion may differ from some user preferences and values. Quantitative data were analyzed with analysis of variance and chi-square tests of independence, and qualitative data were analyzed with conventional qualitative content analysis. Our results highlight that current ravine park users vary widely in their characteristics and the values they pursue through their park access. While the range of ravine park types accommodates some of this variability, there is also conflict between ravine park users with different values and expectations. We are offering a series of recommendations addressing these findings and hope that insights from this deep and rich case study will be of use to other forested, urban greenspaces under similar conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available