4.3 Article

Effect of inseminator on reproductive performance in dairy cattle

Journal

TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03138-2

Keywords

Artificial insemination; Estrus; Reproduction performance; Inseminator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined 227,297 artificial insemination acts conducted by 35 inseminators over a 4-year period in Turkey. The findings showed that the success rate of inseminators has an impact on conception rates. Inseminators with lower success rates should undergo retraining to prevent costs or losses on the farms.
The reproductive efficiency of dairy cattle is critical to the economic success and sustainability of the enterprise. Due to its many advantages, artificial insemination has inevitably taken its place in herd management today, and different artificial insemination methods have been developed until today. At the same time, artificial insemination is carried out by commercial artificial insemination operators or do-it-yourself operators in cattle farms. One of the factors affecting the success of artificial insemination is inseminators. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of inseminators on conception rates in reproductive challenges and to reveal the differences between the success rates of inseminators. A total of 227,297 artificial insemination acts carried out by 35 inseminators for 4 years belonging to the Konya Cattle Breeders' Association in Turkey were assessed for this purpose. In the study, the insemination success rate was determined as 41.36%. In addition, the percentage of inseminators with a total insemination success rate of more than 50% is very low, such as 2.9%, and the percentage of those who achieved 35.9% and below was 9.3%. As a result, it can be stated that the inseminators having a lower success rate than the overall should be retrained to avoid costs or losses in the farms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available