4.5 Article

Height-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solver for Hydrodynamic Lubrication

Journal

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-022-01576-5

Keywords

Fluid mechanics methods; Hydrodynamic lubrication; Cavitation in hydrodynamics; Compressibility in hydrodynamics

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cornerstone of thin-film flow modeling is the Reynolds equation, but its derivation is based on specific assumptions about the fluid constitutive behavior, limiting its applicability in multiscale scenarios. In this study, a method is introduced to treat the macroscopic flow evolution and local cross-film stresses as separate yet coupled problems, overcoming this limitation and validating the approach using examples.
The cornerstone of thin-film flow modeling is the Reynolds equation-a lower-dimensional representation of the Navier-Stokes equation. The derivation of the Reynolds equation is based on explicit assumptions about the constitutive behavior of the fluid that prohibit applications in multiscale scenarios based on measured or atomistically simulated data. Here, we present a method that treats the macroscopic flow evolution and the calculation of local cross-film stresses as separate yet coupled problems-the so-called macro and micro problem. The macro problem considers mass and momentum balance for compressible fluids in a height-averaged sense and is solved using a time-explicit finite-volume scheme. Analytical solutions for the micro problem are derived for common constitutive laws and implemented into the Height-averaged Navier-Stokes (HANS) solver. We demonstrate the validity of our solver on examples, including mass-conserving cavitation, inertial effects, wall slip, and non-Newtonian fluids. The presented method is not limited to these fixed-form relations and may therefore be useful for testing constitutive relations obtained from experiment or simulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available