4.4 Article

How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme

Journal

TRIALS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7

Keywords

Qualitative research with trials; Atrial fibrillation; Frameworks; Working relationships

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0217-20007]
  2. School for Primary Care Research [SPCR-2014-10043, 410]
  3. European Union [847770]
  4. Health Foundation
  5. Wellcome Trust [203921/Z/16/Z]
  6. Health Foundation [RG88620]
  7. NHS in the East of England through the Clinical Academic Reserve
  8. University of Cambridge
  9. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-0217-20007] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. However, its full potential is often not realized in trials. This commentary highlights the contributions of qualitative research to trial design, conduct and day-to-day running, using a feasibility study as an example. Structural factors and relationships play a crucial role in realizing the benefits of embedding qualitative research in trials. Key lessons for planning future trials are outlined.
Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. Despite this, few trials incorporate qualitative methods, and those that do may not realise their full potential. In this commentary, we highlight how qualitative research can contribute to the design, conduct and day-to-day running of a trial, outlining the working arrangements and relationships that facilitate these contributions. In doing so, we draw on (i) existing frameworks on the role of qualitative research alongside trials and (ii) our experience of integrated qualitative research conducted as part of the feasibility study of the SAFER trial (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke), a cluster randomised controlled trial of screening people aged 70 and above for atrial fibrillation in primary care in England. The activities and presence of the qualitative team contributed to important changes in the design, conduct and dayto-day running of the SAFER feasibility study, and the subsequent main trial, informing diverse decisions concerning trial documentation, trial delivery, timing and content of measures and the information given to participating patients and practices. These included asking practices to give screening results to all participants and not just to'screen positive' participants, and greater recognition of the contribution of practice reception staff to trial delivery. These changes were facilitated by a 'one research team' approach that underpinned all formal and informal working processes from the outset and maximised the value of both qualitative and trial coordination expertise. The challenging problems facing health services require a combination of research methods and data types. Our experience and the literature show that the benefits of embedding qualitative research in trials are more likely to be realised if attention is given to both structural factors and relationships from the outset. These include sustained and sufficient funding for qualitative research, embedding qualitative research fully within the trial programme, providing shared infrastructure and resources and committing to relationships based on mutual recognition of and respect for the value of different methods and perspectives. We outline key learning for the planning of future trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available