4.4 Article

Systemic Safety Analysis of Midblock Pedestrian Crashes in Massachusetts

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
Volume 2676, Issue 11, Pages 722-730

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03611981221094566

Keywords

pedestrians; bicycles; human factors; safety; safety; crash analysis; crash data; general; modeling and forecasting; quantitative analysis; safety planning

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation's Safety Data Initiative [69A345205010620]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systemic safety analysis of severe midblock pedestrian crashes in Massachusetts to identify risk factors for pedestrian safety issues. The results showed consistent risk factors across different types of roadways such as number of lanes, traffic volume, population density, commute behaviors, employment density, and measures of equity. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation will use these findings to prioritize sites for midblock pedestrian safety improvements.
Pedestrians are vulnerable road users on Massachusetts roadways, particularly at midblock crossings. To develop safety improvement projects to address pedestrian safety issues, Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) conducted a systemic safety analysis of severe midblock pedestrian crashes. The analysis incorporated crash, roadway, transit, census, and equity data to identify roadway segments that showed the higher probability for a severe pedestrian crash. Based on overrepresentation, principal arterials, minor arterials, and major collectors were identified as focus facility types. Binomial logit regression was used to identify risk factors for each focus facility type. Risk factors included number of lanes, traffic volume, population density, commute behaviors, employment density, and measures of equity. The authors found consistent risk factors across the three focus facility types. Ultimately, MassDOT will use these results to prioritize sites for midblock pedestrian safety systemic improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available