4.4 Article

Teen Driver Distractions and Parental Norms

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
Volume 2676, Issue 10, Pages 622-632

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03611981221090505

Keywords

distracted driving; teenage drivers; novice drivers; young drivers; driver behavior; parental influence; Illegal distraction; human factors

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2016-05580]
  2. Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center (CSRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on parental norms regarding teen driver distractions is lacking, and this paper examines the discrepancies in teens' perception of their parents' engagement and approval of distractions compared to the parents' reports. It also investigates the differences between parents' perception of their teen's distraction engagement and the teen's self-report. The study found that teens who engage more frequently in distractions have misperceptions about their parents' behavior and vice versa. These findings suggest the importance of interventions for both teens and parents.
Research related to parental norms on teen driver distractions is limited, although distracted driving is a serious concern for teens. This paper investigates whether teens' perception of their parent's engagement in and approval of distractions is different to what their parent reports, and whether any discrepancy relates to teens' self-reported distraction engagement frequency. It also investigates whether there are discrepancies between the parents' perception of their teen's distraction engagement frequency and the teen's self-report. A distinction is made between legal and illegal distractions as drivers may build stronger norms around illegal distractions. Analyses were conducted on data from 63 teen-parent dyads from Ontario, Canada, who completed an online survey, including self-reported engagement in 16 distractions and related descriptive (what parents/teens do) and injunctive (what parents approve/disapprove) norms. Dyads were divided into two groups: higher-engagers (n = 27) and lower-engagers (n = 36) based on teens' self-reported engagement frequency. Higher-engagers reported engaging in both distraction types (legal and illegal) more often than their parent did; there was no difference between lower-engagers and their parent. Higher-engagers' perception of their parent's engagement in and approval of legal distractions was higher than their parent's self-report, while these parents perceived their teen's engagement in both distraction types to be lower compared with the teen's self-report. The only discrepancy observed for lower-engagers was that teens' perception of their parent's approval of legal distractions was higher than parents' self-reports. Our findings suggest that misperceptions may exist for teens who engage more frequently in distractions and for their parents, who may benefit from relevant interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available