4.7 Article

Degradation efficiency of Mg65Cu25-xAgxY10 nanoporous dealloyed ribbons on pesticide wastewater

Journal

TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 1472-1484

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(22)65887-4

Keywords

networked nanoporous structure; MgCu-based amorphous ribbon; dealloying; cis-cypermethrin wastewater; degradation efficiency

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Light Alloy Casting Technology for High-end Equipment
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [2020-KF-14-03]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775353]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dealloyed ribbons with networked nanoporous structure exhibit higher degradation efficiency for pesticide wastewater due to their large specific surface areas and enough active sites. The average pore sizes of the nanoporous structure and the degradation efficiency of the wastewater increase with the increase of Ag addition in the dealloyed ribbons.
Dealloyed ribbons with a layer of networked nanoporous structure of different pore sizes were fabricated by dealloying the as-spun Mg65Cu25-xAgxY10 (x=0, 5, 10, at.%) ribbons in dilute H2SO4 solution in order to enhance the degradation efficiency of pesticide wastewater. Compared to the as-spun ribbons, it is found that the dealloyed ribbons with the networked nanoporous structure exhibit higher degradation efficiency due to their large specific surface areas and enough active sites for the degradation process. Both the average pore sizes of the nanoporous structure and the degradation efficiency of the pesticide wastewater increase with the increase of Ag addition in the dealloyed ribbons. The maximum degradation efficiency up to 95.8% is obtained for the Mg65Cu15Ag10Y10 dealloyed ribbon under the optimal conditions of pH being 3, the initial cis-cypermethrin concentration being 500 mg/L, and the dosage of dealloyed ribbon being 1.33 g/L.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available