Microplastics and nanoplastics: Size, surface and dispersant - What causes the effect?

There is increasing evidence that humans are exposed to microplastic particles through contaminated food. Although suitable analytical methods are still lacking, it is likely that these contaminations also contain a nanoplastics fraction. It is known from nanotoxicology that particles may acquire altered toxicological properties with decreasing particle sizes. Particles can also have different surface modalities and functionalizations. Moreover, nano- and microplastics as materials with probably a relatively low toxicity are often applied at high concentrations in in vitro tests, and therefore the solvating agent, namely the dispersant in which the particles are supplied may have a major impact on the outcome. This might be misinterpreted as particle effect. Therefore, it is crucial to determine what causes the effect - size, surface or dispersant? In this study this question was investigated by applying established in vitro models for the intestinal barrier (differentiated Caco-2 monoculture and mucus- and M-cell co-culture) and hepatocytes (differentiated HepaRG cells), mimicking the oral route of particle uptake. A complex set of nine different polystyrene micro- and nanoparticles was used to elucidate the effect of particle size, surface modification and dispersant. Uptake and transport as well as biochemical endpoints were measured, complemented by particle characterization. The results show that indeed some dispersants can cause a more pronounced cytotoxic effect than the particles themselves. Surface modification and particle size show a clear influence on the uptake and cytotoxicity of nano- and microplastic particles.

Automated summary

There is increasing evidence that humans are exposed to microplastic particles through contaminated food. A study found that particle size, surface modification, and dispersant have significant impacts on the uptake and cytotoxicity of nano- and microplastic particles.