Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Bias in the development of health and ecological assessments and potential solutions
Glenn W. Suter et al.
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT (2016)
Weight of evidence evaluation and systematic review in EU chemical risk assessment: Foundation is laid but guidance is needed
Marlene Agerstrand et al.
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL (2016)
Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating ecotoxicity Data (CRED): comparison and perception of the Klimisch and CRED methods for evaluating reliability and relevance of ecotoxicity studies
Robert Kase et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE (2016)
Assessing dose-response relationships for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs): a focus on non-monotonicity
R. Thomas Zoeller et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (2015)
Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP): An Online Resource for Evaluating and Reporting In Vivo (Eco)Toxicity Studies
Linda Molander et al.
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT (2015)
Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs: Executive summary
Claudia Bolognesi et al.
EFSA JOURNAL (2015)
Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals
Marlenea Agerstrand et al.
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT (2014)
Facilitating the use of non-standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting
Anna Beronius et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY (2014)
A new approach to synergize academic and guideline-compliant research: The CLARITY-BPA research program
Thaddeus T. Schug et al.
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY (2013)
The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing
Anna Beronius et al.
TOXICOLOGY (2013)
Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses
Laura N. Vandenberg et al.
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS (2012)
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Story C. Landis et al.
NATURE (2012)
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
Iveta Simera et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2010)
Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A
Anna Beronius et al.
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY (2010)
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Carol Kilkenny et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2010)
Oral Exposure to Bisphenol A Increases Dimethylbenzanthracene-Induced Mammary Cancer in Rats
Sarah Jenkins et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2009)
Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol A
John Peterson Myers et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2009)
Health risk assessment procedures for endocrine disrupting compounds within different regulatory frameworks in the European Union
Anna Beronius et al.
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2009)
Two-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol a in CD-1 (Swiss) mice
Rochelle W. Tyl et al.
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2008)
In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies
Catherine A. Richter et al.
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY (2007)
Interpretations of primary carcinogenicity data in 29 trichloroethylene risk assessments
C Rudén
TOXICOLOGY (2001)
Share Paper
