4.6 Article

Joint patient and clinician priority setting to identify 10 key research questions regarding the long-term sequelae of COVID-19

Journal

THORAX
Volume 77, Issue 7, Pages 717-720

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218582

Keywords

COVID-19

Funding

  1. MRC-UK Research and Innovation
  2. Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research [MR/V027859/1, COV0319]
  3. NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Wellcome Trust [209553/Z/17/Z]
  5. NIHR Clinical Scientist Fellowship [CS-2016-16-020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the large numbers of people infected and high rates of ongoing morbidity, it is necessary to conduct research to address the needs of adult survivors of COVID-19 living with ongoing symptoms (long COVID). A research prioritisation process was completed, incorporating views from adults with ongoing symptoms of COVID-19, carers, clinicians, and clinical researchers, to direct resource and research efforts. The top 10 research questions, identified through an independently mediated workshop, include understanding the underlying mechanisms, developing diagnostic tools, investigating the trajectory of recovery, and evaluating interventions during acute and persistent phases of the illness.
Given the large numbers of people infected and high rates of ongoing morbidity, research is clearly required to address the needs of adult survivors of COVID-19 living with ongoing symptoms (long COVID). To help direct resource and research efforts, we completed a research prioritisation process incorporating views from adults with ongoing symptoms of COVID-19, carers, clinicians and clinical researchers. The final top 10 research questions were agreed at an independently mediated workshop and included: identifying underlying mechanisms of long COVID, establishing diagnostic tools, understanding trajectory of recovery and evaluating the role of interventions both during the acute and persistent phases of the illness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available