4.7 Article

Prediction of shear capacity of steel channel sections using machine learning algorithms

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109152

Keywords

Channel sections; Shear capacity; Design rules; Machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study applies popular machine learning algorithms to predict the shear resistance of steel channel sections using experimental and numerical data. The results show that the implemented machine learning models reliably predict the shear capacity of steel channel sections and exceed the prediction accuracy of existing design equations.
This study presents the application of popular machine learning algorithms in prediction of the shear resistance of steel channel sections using experimental and numerical data. Datasets of 108 results of stainless steel lipped channel sections and 238 results of carbon steel LiteSteel sections were gathered to train machine learning models including support vector regression (SVR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The cross-validation with 10 folds has been conducted in the training process to avoid over-fitting. The optimal hyperparameter combinations for each machine learning model were found during the hyperparameter tuning process and four performance indicators were used to evaluate the performance of the trained models. The comparison results suggest that all four implemented machine learning models reliably predict the shear capacity of both stainless steel lipped channel sections and carbon steel LiteSteel sections while the implemented SVR algorithm is found to be the best performing model. Moreover, it is shown that the implemented machine learning models exceed the prediction accuracy of the available design equations in estimating the shear capacity of steel channel sections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available