4.5 Article

Oxidation of partially decomposed wood: Experimental investigation and kinetic analysis

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 712, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2022.179215

Keywords

Biomass; Torrefaction; Chemical composition; Thermal analysis; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Program of Russian Federation 2021-2030 [FWEU-2021-0005]
  2. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [18-29-24047, Y13. CKP.21.0038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article studies the oxidation process of wood with different degrees of thermal conversion experimentally, proposing a new method for kinetic analysis of biomass decomposition. By comparing experimental data, the differences in thermochemical behavior of biomass and its components during thermal degradation are discussed.
The purpose of this article is to study experimentally the oxidation process of wood of different degrees of thermal conversion. We compared experimental data of thermogravimetric analysis in the oxidizing environment of raw wood, cellulose, lignin, and wood samples of different degrees of thermal conversion. Thermally treated wood samples were obtained by heating raw pine wood in an inert atmosphere to a given temperature (250, 300, 350, 400, 500 degrees C), followed by rapid quenching in water. All obtained samples were studied by the thermal analysis combined with mass spectrometry (TGA-MS) in inert and oxidizing environments; technical (moisture content, ash content, volatile yield, or W, A, V) and elemental analysis (C, H, O) data were obtained. We propose a new method for kinetic analysis of biomass decomposition: the change in the leading decomposition mechanisms is monitored by the change in the composition of the detected products. Differences between the thermochemical behavior of biomass, its individual components (cellulose and lignin), and their thermal degradation products are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available