4.7 Article

Dynamic fracture criterion-fracture path of cracks emigrating from two circular blastholes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103233

Keywords

Dynamic fracture criterion; T-stress; Crack deflection angle; Crack propagation path

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51974316]
  2. National Key Research and Develop-ment Program of China [2021YFB3401500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the hooked or butterfly-shaped phenomenon commonly observed in rock excavation and mining projects using an effective model. The study analyzes the propensity of forming the hook pattern combination with dynamic fracture criterion, and examines the crack deflection angles and propagation paths under variable model parameters. The results show that crack velocities lead to gradual increase in crack deflection angles regardless of plane states, Poisson's ratios, or model heights. Model height has a significant effect on crack deflection, with lower model heights resulting in larger deflection angles.
To investigate the hooked or butterfly-shaped phenonmen, which is often observed in rock excavating and mining projects. An effective model is adopted to study the propensity of forming the hook pattern combination with dynamic fracture criterion in this paper. Considering the T-stress and crack velocity, the crack deflection angles under variable model parameters are analyzed, and the crack propagation paths are simulated. The results showed that: (1) with the increase of crack velocities, the crack deflection angles increase gradually regardless of the change of plane states, Poisson's ratios or model heights, (2) model height exhibits a significant effect on the crack deflection, as model height becomes less, the deflection angles becomes larger, (3) the hook phenonmen would happen under some circumstances. The results can provide some basic understanding in fracture plane control in mining fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available