4.5 Article

Finite element modeling effects of fiber performance on pilling of polyester-cotton woven fabrics

Journal

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
Volume 92, Issue 13-14, Pages 2247-2264

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00405175221080098

Keywords

Polyester-cotton woven fabrics; pilling; finite element method; fiber diameter; friction coefficient; fiber elastic modulus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to numerically analyze the effects of polyester fiber performance on the pilling of polyester-cotton woven fabrics. The results show that an increase in fiber diameter decreases the pilling grades, while increasing the fiber friction coefficient and elastic modulus have certain effects on the pilling grades.
This paper aims to numerically establish the effects of polyester fiber performance on the pilling of polyester-cotton woven fabrics, including pilling grades, overall energy absorption and the forms of energy absorption. Geometric models of fabric and hairiness are established using the Python programming language based on the length and density distribution of hairiness on the fabric surface. The finite element method is adopted to simulate the pilling process of polyester-cotton woven fabrics with different polyester fiber performance parameters. The simulated pilling grades of fabrics are fairly close to the practical pilling grades, whose relative error is 7.3%. With the increase of fiber diameter, pilling grades decrease. Increasing the fiber friction coefficient also affects pilling grades, which firstly decrease and then increase. Pilling grades reduce with the increased fiber elastic modulus. Friction dissipation energy during pilling becomes the dominant form of energy. When the fiber diameter is less than 14 mu m, the fiber friction coefficient is between 0.3 and 0.4 and the fiber elastic modulus is greater than 4.55 GPa, fabrics start pilling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available