4.6 Article

The neglected role of knowledge assets interplay in the pursuit of organisational ambidexterity

Journal

TECHNOVATION
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102452

Keywords

Knowledge assets; Intellectual capital; Organizational ambidexterity; Organisational learning; Organisational learning ambidexterity; Exploration; Exploitation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61977023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organizational ambidexterity is a strategic challenge for contemporary organizations that involves the simultaneous pursuit of exploitative and explorative learning. Depending on the form adopted, these activities can be carried out asynchronously or synchronously. Social and organizational capital are central to pursuing exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity directly, while human capital plays a significant role in supporting other types of knowledge assets. Social capital also plays a dual role in supporting organizational capital and being central in the pursuit of ambidexterity outcomes.
Organizational ambidexterity is a strategic challenge for the contemporary organizations. It involves the simul-taneous or synchronous pursuit of two inherently incompatible and conflicting activities - exploitative learning to become efficient in the current business activities, and explorative learning to predict and work on future chal-lenges, opportunities, and demands. Depending upon the form(s) of ambidexterity an organization adopts, these two conflicting activities can be pursued asynchronously across different time phases, or synchronously in separate units, and/or in the same units by the employees. This study postulated and found that the Bontis (1998) model of interplay between knowledge assets can enable the successful pursuit of all the forms of ambidexterity, either synchronous pursuit of exploration and exploitation by the employees across same or different units or asynchronous pursuit across different time phases. The study used a multisource sample of 424 respondents from the various firms in the South Korean industries. The findings demonstrated that the organisational and the social capital are central to pursuing exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity directly while human capital played a significant role in supporting the other two types of knowledge assets. In addition, social capital played a dual role to be both supportive of organisational capital and being central in the pursuit of ambidexterity outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available