4.7 Article

Internal calibration as an emerging approach for endogenous analyte quantification: Application to steroids

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123149

Keywords

Steroids; Quantification; Internal calibration; Response factor; Multiple isotopologue reaction monitoring

Funding

  1. Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT, Switzerland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an innovative internal calibration approach using stable isotope-labeled standard version of endogenous compound was developed to improve the quantitative performance of mass spectrometry methods. The results showed that the response factors obtained on different LC-MS platforms were consistent and the quantitative results in human serum samples were similar to those obtained with conventional quantification approach based on external calibration. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the naturally occurring isotopes of SIL could be used to increase the accuracy for analytes with low concentrations.
The use of mass spectrometry methods with triple quadrupole instruments is well established for quantification. However, the preparation of calibration curves can be time-consuming and prone to analytical errors. In this study, an innovative internal calibration (IC) approach using a one-standard calibration with a stable isotope-labeled (SIL) standard version of the endogenous compound was developed. To ensure optimal quantitative performance, the following parameters were evaluated: the stability of the analyte-to-SIL response factor (RF), the chemical and isotopic purities of the SIL, and the instrumental reproducibility. Using six clinically important endogenous steroids and their respective SIL standards, we demonstrated that RFs obtained on different LC-MS platforms were consistent. The quantitative performance of the proposed approach was determined using quality control samples prepared in depleted serum, and showed both satisfactory precision (1.3%-12.4%) and trueness (77.5%-107.0%, with only 3 values outside +/- 30%). The developed method was then applied to human serum samples, and the results were similar to those obtained with the conventional quantification approach based on external calibration: the Passing-Bablok regression showed a proportional bias of 6.8% and a mean difference of -5.9% between the two methodologies. Finally, we showed that the naturally occurring isotopes of the SIL can be used to provide additional calibration points and increase the accuracy for analytes with low concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available