4.6 Article

Cause and outcome of aborting a difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to severe inflammation: a study of operative notes

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09110-3

Keywords

Cholecystectomy; Aborted cholecystectomy; Subtotal cholecystectomy; Abandoned cholecystectomy; Difficult gallbladder; Difficult cholecystectomy; Modified accordion grading system; MAGS

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a retrospective review of cholecystectomies performed by HPB surgeons at our center from 2005 to 2019. It found that encountering anatomical difficulties during the surgery was rare but aborting the procedure and referring the patient to an HPB center proved to be an effective bail-out strategy.
Background Upon encountering a difficult cholecystectomy in which, after a reasonable trial of dissection, anatomical identification has not been attained due to severe inflammation, and the risk of additional dissection is deemed to be hazardous, bail-out strategies are encouraged safety valves. One strategy is to abort the cholecystectomy and refer the patient to a HPB center for further management. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of cholecystectomies performed by HPB surgeons at our center between 2005 and 2019. We identified 63 patients who had an aborted cholecystectomy because of acute or chronic cholecystitis and were referred for additional care. Of these, operative notes and other clinical records were available for 43 patients who were included in this study. Results 42 cholecystectomies (98%) were started laparoscopically. 25 patients (58%) had chronic cholecystitis, and 18 (42%) had acute cholecystitis. 40 cases (93%) fell into the highest level of difficulty on the Nassar scale (Grade 4). Procedures were aborted at the following stages of dissection: in 10 patients (23%), none of the gallbladder was identified; in another 11 (26%), only the dome of gallbladder was identified; the body of the gallbladder was exposed in 13 (30%); and dissection of the hepatocystic triangle was attempted unsuccessfully in 9 (21%). Following referral to our center, 30 patients (70%) were managed with total cholecystectomy while in 13 cases (30%), subtotal cholecystectomy was performed. Conclusion Aborting cholecystectomy and referring the patient to an HPB center is rarely needed but is an effective bail-out strategy for general surgeons encountering highly difficult operative conditions due to inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available