4.2 Article

CHARACTERIZATION OF DEFECTS IN TUNGSTEN SAMPLES INTERESTED IN PFM STUDIES USING POSITRON ANNIHILATION AND PHOTOLUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY

Journal

SURFACE REVIEW AND LETTERS
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218625X22500536

Keywords

Tungsten; plasma-facing material; positron annihilation spectroscopy; photoluminescence spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The defect structure of four pure tungsten samples before and after annealing was investigated using SEM, XRD, PL, and PAS techniques. The results showed that with the increase in annealing temperature, the grain size of the samples increased, the concentration of defects decreased, the preferred grain growth occurred in the (2 0 0) orientation, and the samples underwent almost perfect recrystallization.
The defect structure of four pure tungsten samples is investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), photoluminescence (PL) and positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) techniques before and after annealing. The results of the SEM and XRD analyses show that the grain size is increased up to 43.3 mu m, and their growth in the (2 0 0) orientation occurs at 1673 K. Also, the smooth of the peaks at 1673 K in the PL test demonstrates the increase of the size of defects of the sample. Moreover, the results of the PAS indicate a decrease in the concentration of defects and an increase in their size at 1673 K, which confirms the results obtained from the PL measurement. The collected results from the four examination techniques are in close agreement with each other and reveal that with the increase in the annealing temperature of tungsten samples, a gradual coalescence of the defects would happen to lead to an increase in their size and hence a reduction in their number as well as preferred grain growth in the (2 0 0) orientation and virtually perfect recrystallization of the samples at higher temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available