Journal
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 983-994Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2058706
Keywords
Addiction; opioid addiction; substance abuse; substance use disorder; qualitative research
Categories
Funding
- United Way of Summit County in Akron, Ohio
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This qualitative study compared the perspectives of service users and professionals on current substance use disorders (SUD) services in Summit County, Ohio. The findings revealed both similarities and differences between the two groups on various themes, including the effectiveness of medication-assisted treatment, challenges in SUD recovery, and factors affecting treatment outcomes.
Background: The purpose of this qualitative study was to compare and contrast the differing perspectives of service users and professionals regarding the current substance use disorders (SUD) services provided in Summit County, Ohio. Seven focus groups were conducted with 44 participants (52.3% male, mean age 46 years), including 15 individuals in recovery, 16 direct service providers, and 13 executive directors. The participants were asked about three areas: (1) effective treatment for SUD, (2) challenges for persons with SUD, and (3) suggestions for improving SUD treatment outcomes. The data were analyzed and coded according to major themes. Results: While there were numerous emergent themes that were concordant between service use and professionals, several differing themes between the groups were also identified. First, participants disagreed on the effectiveness of medication-assisted treatment/Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. Second, professionals identified trauma, stigma, one-size-fits-all approach to treatment, and limitations set by managed care act as barriers to treatment, whereas individuals in recovery reported difficulty dealing with feelings, feeling of being rushed into recovery, and the lack of long-term recovery plans as the most significant barriers. Lastly, in order to improve treatment outcomes, professionals emphasized the importance of education unlike individuals in recovery who identified sober supports as the most important factor. Conclusion: This study identified challenges in SUD recovery and highlights essential areas for consideration when developing and implementing SUD treatment. The findings can be used as guidelines to provide better services to individuals with SUDs. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2058706 .
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available