4.5 Article

Multilevel estimation of normalization constants using ensemble Kalman-Bucy filters

Journal

STATISTICS AND COMPUTING
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-022-10094-2

Keywords

Multilevel Monte Carlo; Filtering; Kalman-Bucy filter; Normalizing constant; Parameter estimation

Funding

  1. KAUST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the application of multilevel Monte Carlo in the estimation of normalizing constants, specifically focusing on the multilevel ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (MLEnKBF) method. Numerical results are provided to validate the approach, and parameter estimation is tested on atmospheric science models such as the stochastic Lorenz 63 and 96 model.
In this article we consider the application of multilevel Monte Carlo, for the estimation of normalizing constants. In particular we will make use of the filtering algorithm, the ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF), which is an N-particle representation of the Kalman-Bucy filter (KBF). The EnKBF is of interest as it coincides with the optimal filter in the continuous-linear setting, i.e. the KBF. This motivates our particular setup in the linear setting. The resulting methodology we will use is the multilevel ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (MLEnKBF). We provide an analysis based on deriving L-q-bounds for the normalizing constants using both the single-level, and the multilevel algorithms, which is largely based on previous work deriving the MLEnKBF Chada et al. (2022). Our results will be highlighted through numerical results, where we firstly demonstrate the error-to-cost rates of the MLEnICBFs comparing it to the EnKBF on a linear Gaussian model. Our analysis will be specific to one variant of the MLEnKBF, whereas the numerics will be tested on different variants. We also exploit this methodology for parameter estimation, where we test this on the models arising in atmospheric sciences, such as the stochastic Lorenz 63 and 96 model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available