4.4 Article

The Polar Cap (PC) Index: PCS Version Based on Dome-C Data

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021SW002941

Keywords

solar wind magnetosphere interaction; polar cap geomagnetic variations; polar cap index; space weather; geomagnetic storms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces different versions of the standard polar cap (PC) indices, as well as derivation procedures developed to generate alternative PCS index values based on Dome Concordia (Dome-C) data. The assessments of the new PCS index have shown its unprecedented high relevance. Some methods used in this study deviate from the corresponding features considered inadequate by the International Association for Geomagnetism and Aeronomy-endorsed PC index derivation methods.
The standard polar cap (PC) indices, PCN (North) based on magnetic data from Qaanaaq in Greenland and PCS (South) based on data from Vostok in Antarctica, have been submitted from the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute in St. Petersburg, Russia, the Danish Meteorological Institute, and the Danish Space Research Institute in different versions. In order to consolidate PCS indices based on Vostok data or replace poor or missing index data, derivation procedures have been developed to generate alternative PCS index values based on data from Dome Concordia (Dome-C) magnetic observations from epoch 2009-2020 of solar cycle 24. The reference levels and calibration parameters needed for calculations of Dome-C-based PCS values in post-event and real-time versions are defined and explained in the present work. Assessments of the new PCS index have shown its unprecedented high relevance. Part of the methods used here, such as the quiet reference level construction and the correlation and regression procedures used for calculations of scaling parameters, deviate from corresponding features considered inadequate of the International Association for Geomagnetism and Aeronomy-endorsed PC index derivation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available