4.7 Article

Development of empirical CPTu-Vs correlations for post-glacial sediments in Southern Quebec, Canada, in consideration of soil type and geological setting

Journal

SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107131

Keywords

Piezocone penetration test (CPTu); Shear wave velocity; Seismic piezocone (SCPTu); Multiple nonlinear regression; Empirical correlation; Soil behaviour type (SBT)

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and En-gineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RDCPJ 521771-17]
  2. Hydro-Quebec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the correlation between shear wave velocity (V-s) and piezocone penetration test (CPTu) parameters in post-glacial sediments. It finds that existing correlations are biased and develops specific correlations that consider soil type and geological setting.
The correlation of shear wave velocity (V-s) with piezocone penetration test (CPTu) parameters is investigated in post-glacial sediments along the St. Lawrence and Saguenay rivers, Southern Quebec, Canada. The compiled database includes 991 CPTu-V-s measurements at 40 sites. The objectives are to examine the applicability of existing CPTu-Vs correlations, identify the main CPTu parameters and develop specific CPTu-V-s correlations that account for the effects of soil type (sandy or clayey) and geological setting (Champlain or Laflamme sea sediments). Results reveal that the application of existing correlations is biased in varying degrees, denoting a need for site-specific correlations for the study area. Multivariate regression analyses confirm the importance of cone tip resistance and depth as V-s predictors assisted by normalised pore pressure and soil behaviour type index. Consideration of soil type and geological setting helps reduce uncertainties in CPTu-V-s correlations for finegrained soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available