4.7 Article

Phenology-dependent root bacteria enhance yield of Brassica napus

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108468

Keywords

Canola; Root microbiome; Holobiont; Agriculture; Soil microbial niches

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Brassica napus is associated with multiple root bacterial communities that influence crop yield through different mechanisms. Therefore, the relationship between B. napus phenology and holobiont community assembly and function should be considered when selecting microbiome-associated traits for use in breeding programs.
The plant root microbiome can enhance yield in crops, but whether this effect is due to one yield-promoting bacterial community consisting of key taxa, or multiple configurations of taxa with different traits is unclear. A changing climate and the need to reduce carbon-intensive agricultural inputs has spurred breeding programs to explore holobiont approaches to optimizing crop yields. Here we used an extensive dataset of >1300 Brassica napus (a key oilseed crop) root samples across 4 trials and 16 varieties in a novel, robust analytical pipeline to decipher the beneficial root-associated bacterial communities associated with B. napus yield performance. We found three taxonomically distinct, but phylogenetically similar communities associated with leaf development, anthesis, and seed development that were linked to crop yield performance across multiple years and sites. Here we show B. napus is associated with not one, but several phenology-dependent yield-promoting root bacterial communities that influence seed yield via different, and yet undetermined, mechanisms. Therefore, we need to consider the relationship between B. napus phenology, and holobiont community assembly and function in selecting microbiome associated traits for use in breeding programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available