4.8 Review

Recent Progress on Fe-Based Single/Dual-Atom Catalysts for Zn-Air Batteries

Journal

SMALL
Volume 18, Issue 43, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202106635

Keywords

dual-atom catalysts; Fe-based catalysts; single-atom catalysts; structure-performance relationship; Zn-air batteries

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP160102627, DP200100365]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP200100365] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review presents some fundamental concepts in the field of zinc-air batteries (ZABs) and summarizes the recent progress on Fe-based single-atom catalysts (SACs) and dual-atom catalysts (DACs). The relationship between structure and performance at the atomic level is emphasized, aiming to provide helpful guidelines for future rational designs of efficient electrocatalysts.
As one of the most competitive candidates for large-scale energy storage, zinc-air batteries (ZABs) have attracted great attention due to their high theoretical specific energy density, low toxicity, high abundance, and high safety. It is highly desirable but still remains a huge challenge, however, to achieve cheap and efficient electrocatalysts to promote their commercialization. Recently, Fe-based single-atom and dual-atom catalysts (SACs and DACs, respectively) have emerged as powerful candidates for ZABs derived from their maximum utilization of atoms, excellent catalytic performance, and low price. In this review, some fundamental concepts in the field of ZABs are presented and the recent progress on the reported Fe-based SACs and DACs is summarized, mainly focusing on the relationship between structure and performance at the atomic level, with the aim of providing helpful guidelines for future rational designs of efficient electrocatalysts with atomically dispersed active sites. Finally, the great advantages and future challenges in this field of ZABs are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available