4.6 Article

Perspective - ultrastructural analyses reflect the effects of sleep and sleep loss on neuronal cell biology

Journal

SLEEP
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac047

Keywords

sleep; sleep deprivation; organelle; ultrastructure; heterochromatin; Golgi; endoplasmic reticulum (ER); endosomes; lysosomes; reactive oxygen species; unfolded protein response

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 NS118440, R01 NS104776]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that sleep loss, both acute and chronic, can lead to structural changes in various organelles, such as mitochondria, nucleus, and Golgi apparatus, in the neurons of Drosophila and rodents. These changes in morphology may be related to altered organelle function and can disrupt fundamental cellular processes like transcription, translation, intracellular transport, and metabolism, particularly in cases of chronic sleep loss. A better understanding of these effects is important for comprehending the biological significance of sleep and its relationship with neuropathology.
Recent electron microscopic analyses of neurons in the Drosophila and rodent brain demonstrate that acute or chronic sleep loss can alter the structures of various organelles, including mitochondria, nucleus, and Golgi apparatus. Here, we discuss these findings in the context of biochemical findings from the sleep deprived brain, to clarify how these morphological changes may related to altered organelle function. We discuss how, taken together, the available data suggest that sleep loss (particularly chronic sleep loss) disrupts such fundamental cellular processes as transcription, translation, intracellular transport, and metabolism. A better understanding of these effects will have broad implications for understanding the biological importance of sleep, and the relationship of sleep loss to neuropathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available