4.6 Article

Direction Finding for Multiple Wideband Chirp Signal Sources using Blind Signal Separation and Matched Filtering

Journal

SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108642

Keywords

Blind source separation (BSS); Independent component analysis; Direction-of-arrival (DOA); Wideband signal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new scheme to estimate the direction-of-arrival (DOA) of multiple wideband chirp signals. The proposed scheme involves preprocessing the mixed signal using independent component analysis, transforming the wideband chirp signals into narrowband signals through matched filtering, and estimating the final DOAs using the conventional subspace-based method. Extensive experiments validate that the proposed scheme provides accurate results in terms of root-mean-squared error (RMSE) and has the lowest computational complexity compared to previous methods.
This paper proposes a new scheme to estimate the direction-of-arrival (DOA) of multiple wideband chirp signals. The proposed scheme comprises three steps: 1) preprocessing of the mixed signal using independent component analysis in order to obtain each wideband chirp signal; 2) matched filtering in order to transform the multiple wideband chirp signals into narrowband signals; and 3) the estimation of final DOAs using the conventional subspace-based method. In order to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme, we carried out extensive experiments, including three different scenarios: non-overlapped in the frequency domain, overlapped in the frequency domain, and nonlinear chirp signal cases. From the experimental results, we can conclude that the proposed scheme provides not only accurate results in terms of root-mean-squared error (RMSE), but also the lowest computational complexity compared to the previous methods.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available