4.6 Article

SURFACE FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION OF SPHERICAL WHITTLE--MAT\'ERN GAUSSIAN RANDOM FIELDS

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages A825-A842

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/21M1400717

Keywords

stochastic partial differential equations; Gaussian random fields; fractional operators; parametric finite element methods; strong convergence; surface finite element method

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council (VR) [2017-04274, 2020-04170]
  2. Wallenberg AI, Autonomous Systems and Software Program (WASP) - Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Chalmers AI Research Centre (CHAIR)
  4. Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand [18-UOO-143]
  5. NKFIH [131545]
  6. Vinnova [2017-04274] Funding Source: Vinnova
  7. Swedish Research Council [2020-04170, 2017-04274] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers the solution of fractional elliptic stochastic partial differential equations on the sphere using Spherical Whittle--Mate'\rn Gaussian random fields. The approximation is done using surface finite elements and a quadrature of the Dunford-Taylor integral representation. Strong error analysis is performed and the computational complexity is bounded. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical findings.
Spherical Whittle--Mate'\rn Gaussian random fields are considered as solutions to fractional elliptic stochastic partial differential equations on the sphere. Approximation is done with surface finite elements. While the nonfractional part of the operator is solved by a recursive scheme, a quadrature of the Dunford-Taylor integral representation is employed for the fractional part. Strong error analysis is performed, and the computational complexity is bounded in terms of the accuracy. Numerical experiments for different choices of parameters confirm the theoretical findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available