4.7 Article

The protonated 2 x 4 tunnel manganese oxide nanobelts for high-efficient electrochemical rubidium enrichment

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120635

Keywords

Manganese oxide; Faradaic redox reaction; Specific capacitance; Electrochemical reaction; Rubidium adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [U1607116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a series of protonated nanobelts based on octahedral molecular sieve-5 (OMS-5) were synthesized and used for electrochemical enrichment of rubidium ion (Rb+) in aqueous solution. The protonated nanobelts exhibited excellent specific capacitance and adsorption capacity, indicating their great potential for selective rubidium ion enrichment.
Octahedral molecular sieve - 5 (OMS-5), a typical 2 x 4 tunnel manganese oxide, is considered as an adsorbent for rubidium ion (Rb+) because of its specific tunnel structure. Also, manganese oxide-based nanomaterials are also widely used in supercapacitor energy storage and capacitor deionization electrodes due to their high specific capacitance. In this work, a series of protonated OMS-5 (H-OMS-5, H-Co-OMS-5, and H-Ni-OMS-5) nanobelts are synthesized and used as electrode materials for electrochemical enrichment of Rb+ in aqueous solution. The specific capacity values for H-OMS-5, H-Co-OMS-5, and H-Ni-OMS-5 at 1 A.g(- 1) are of 159, 168, and 215 F.g(- 1), respectively. Thanks to the unique protonated 2 x 4 tunnel structure, well regulating surface area, and excellent specific capacitance, the maximum Rb+ adsorption capacities of H-OMS-5, H-Co-OMS-5, and H-Ni-OMS-5 can reach to 390.3, 405.7, and 481.7 mg.g(- 1), respectively. These results indicate that the protonated 2 x 4 tunnel manganese dioxide nanobelts are of great potentials as faradaic electrode materials for selective rubidium ion enrichment applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available