4.7 Article

Nitrate reduction with bimetallic catalysts. A stability-addressed overview

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 290, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120750

Keywords

Nitrate; Catalytic reduction; Catalyst deactivation; Regeneration

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO [PID2019-108445RB-I00]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid (BIO-TRES-CM) [S2018/EMT-4344, PEJD-265 2017-PRE/AMB-4616]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrate pollution of water bodies is a serious global environmental problem, and there is a lack of cost-effective solutions for its removal. Catalytic reduction is an emerging technology that can transform nitrate into harmless nitrogen gas, but it faces challenges in stability and catalyst regeneration.
Nitrate (NO3-) pollution of water bodies is a serious environmental problem worldwide. One of the major concerns about NO3- contamination is the lack of cost-effective solutions for its removal from potential drinking water resources. Current technologies, such as ion exchange, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis, produce a reject with high NO3- concentration. Catalytic reduction is an emerging technology, capable of transforming NO3- into harmless N-2. A critical issue is to achieve almost complete selectivity to this last species so that the final concentrations of NO2- and NH4+ can fit the stringent allowed limits. Numerous studies have been carried out evaluating the activity and N-2 selectivity of bimetallic catalysts. Catalyst deactivation by surface fouling, irreversible oxidation of the metal promoter, metal leaching and aggregation of metallic particles remain a major challenge for full-scale implementation of catalytic nitrate reduction. Therefore, it is necessary to develop highly stable catalyst and/or effective solutions for catalyst regeneration. The existing literature on this respect is reviewed hereby.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available