4.6 Article

Device for Torsional Fatigue Strength Assessment Adapted for Pulsating Testing Machines

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22072667

Keywords

fatigue test; stress; strain; fatigue limit; device fatigue; calibration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a simple and reliable device for torsional fatigue testing, adaptable to a universal pulsating testing machine, for determining the torsion fatigue limit of different materials. It also introduces an experimental method for determining shear strains, comparing values obtained from a calibration experiment with those from theoretical calculation.
The torsional fatigue test determines the fatigue limit for a certain asymmetry coefficient of the cycle. The assessment of fatigue tests is performed on specialized machines. There are two types of torsion testing machines: universal machines that have the torsion component and specialized machines only for torsion testing. Nevertheless, no matter which proposed option we choose, the purchase prices for these testing machines or the values spent for self-management are quite high. This paper presented a device used for torsion fatigue testing, adaptable to a universal pulsating testing machine, designed to determine the torsion fatigue limit for different materials. The built device is simple and reliable, and therefore inexpensive. By using this device, we can determine the limit of the torsional fatigue after any stress cycle and we can use the parameters obtained from the universal machine to which it was attached. The torque and twisting angle of the test specimen during the test can be determined by calculation. The paper also presented an experimental method for determining shear strains based on calibration experiment, using a specimen on which strain gauges were mounted. The values taken from this calibration experiment were compared with those obtained from the theoretical calculation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available