4.6 Article

Acoustic Emission Source Location Using Finite Element Generated Delta-T Mapping

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22072493

Keywords

Acoustic Emission; Non-Destructive Evaluation; Structural Health Monitoring; delta-T mapping; finite element; Hsu-Nielsen sources; source location; complex plate

Funding

  1. Lloyd's Register Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acoustic Emission (AE) testing offers significant benefits in damage location capability, but the time-consuming training process of the delta-T mapping technique can be a barrier to large-scale applications. The Finite Element (FE) method provides a solution by reducing the time and effort required for data collection and processing.
One of the most significant benefits of Acoustic Emission (AE) testing over other Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) techniques lies in its damage location capability over a wide area. The delta-T mapping technique developed by researchers has been shown to enable AE source location to a high level of accuracy in complex structures. However, the time-consuming and laborious data training process of the delta-T mapping technique has prevented this technique from large-scale application on large complex structures. In order to solve this problem, a Finite Element (FE) method was applied to model training data for localization of experimental AE events on a complex plate. Firstly, the FE model was validated through demonstrating consistency between simulated data and the experimental data in the study of Hsu-Nielsen (H-N) sources on a simple plate. Then, the FE model with the same parameters was applied to a planar location problem on a complex plate. It has been demonstrated that FE generated delta-T mapping data can achieve a reasonable degree of source location accuracy with an average error of 3.88 mm whilst decreasing the time and effort required for manually collecting and processing the training data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available