4.6 Article

Energy Efficient Consensus Approach of Blockchain for IoT Networks with Edge Computing

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22103733

Keywords

blockchain; consensus; energy; edge; offloading

Funding

  1. Rector of the Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland [09/010/RGJ22/0068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blockchain technology has gained significant attention in various fields, but current consensus algorithms face challenges of high energy consumption and memory utilization. This paper proposes a PoW-based consensus approach that offloads mining tasks to edge networks, leading to higher energy efficiency and lower resource consumption.
Blockchain technology is gaining a lot of attention in various fields, such as intellectual property, finance, smart agriculture, etc. The security features of blockchain have been widely used, integrated with artificial intelligence, Internet of Things (IoT), software defined networks (SDN), etc. The consensus mechanism of blockchain is its core and ultimately affects the performance of the blockchain. In the past few years, many consensus algorithms, such as proof of work (PoW), ripple, proof of stake (PoS), practical byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT), etc., have been designed to improve the performance of the blockchain. However, the high energy requirement, memory utilization, and processing time do not match with our actual desires. This paper proposes the consensus approach on the basis of PoW, where a single miner is selected for mining the task. The mining task is offloaded to the edge networking. The miner is selected on the basis of the digitization of the specifications of the respective machines. The proposed model makes the consensus approach more energy efficient, utilizes less memory, and less processing time. The improvement in energy consumption is approximately 21% and memory utilization is 24%. Efficiency in the block generation rate at the fixed time intervals of 20 min, 40 min, and 60 min was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available