4.6 Article

Metadata Framework to Support Deployment of Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Trials in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22062136

Keywords

digital health technology; Parkinson's disease; metadata standards

Funding

  1. Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium
  2. Biogen
  3. Takeda
  4. Lundbeck
  5. UCB Pharma
  6. Roche
  7. AbbVie
  8. Merck
  9. Michael J Fox Foundation
  10. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
  11. FDA/HHS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Digital health technologies generate valuable sensor data in clinical trials, but there is currently a lack of standardized methods to capture and store this data across different modalities and disease areas. This paper proposes a metadata framework that allows for pre-specification and standardization of the use of digital health technologies, promoting data comparability in future studies.
Sensor data from digital health technologies (DHTs) used in clinical trials provides a valuable source of information, because of the possibility to combine datasets from different studies, to combine it with other data types, and to reuse it multiple times for various purposes. To date, there exist no standards for capturing or storing DHT biosensor data applicable across modalities and disease areas, and which can also capture the clinical trial and environment-specific aspects, so-called metadata. In this perspectives paper, we propose a metadata framework that divides the DHT metadata into metadata that is independent of the therapeutic area or clinical trial design (concept of interest and context of use), and metadata that is dependent on these factors. We demonstrate how this framework can be applied to data collected with different types of DHTs deployed in the WATCH-PD clinical study of Parkinson's disease. This framework provides a means to pre-specify and therefore standardize aspects of the use of DHTs, promoting comparability of DHTs across future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available