4.7 Article

Sliding energy landscape governs interfacial failure of nanotube-reinforced ceramic nanocomposites

Journal

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114413

Keywords

Silica-2D material interfaces; Interfacial shear; Sliding energy landscape; Single-nanotube pullout experiments; Density functional theory

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-CMMI 2009684, 2009134, 2006127, OCI-0725070, ACI-1238993]
  2. state of Illinois
  3. New York NASA Space Grant Consortium
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [2009134] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [2006127] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By conducting single nanotube pullout force measurements and DFT calculations, the study reveals the sliding adhesion of hBN on silica exhibits stronger directional dependence with unusually high energy barriers compared to graphene. The interfacial adhesion energy and shear strength across termination structures of silica with hBN are found to be significantly higher than with graphene.
We report the sliding adhesion of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) and graphene on silica using single nanotube pullout force measurements and potential energy landscape calculations by density functional theory (DFT). In contrast to isotropic sliding of graphene on silica, the sliding of hBN on silica exhibits strong directional dependence with unusually high energy barriers formed by stacking of unterminated Si or O atoms on N atoms. Stronger interfacial adhesion energy and shear strength across possible termination structures of silica with hBN versus graphene cumulate in the measured interfacial shear strength of similar to 34.7 MPa versus similar to 19.2 MPa for the respective nanotube-reinforced composites (C) 2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available