Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 127, Issue 12, Pages 7397-7414Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04336-3
Keywords
Interdisciplinarity; Diversity; Entropy; Mutual information; Multinomial distribution
Funding
- University of Zurich
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Diversity is a central concept in ecology, social sciences, and bibliometrics. This study proposes a probability-based diversity indicator that reconceptualizes the components of diversity as entropy masses, addressing an inconsistency issue in existing indicators. The overall diversity of research projects in terms of entropy is estimated, with journal articles being the most balanced output type across research areas.
Diversity is a central concept not only in ecology, but also in the social sciences and in bibliometrics. The discussion about an adequate measure of diversity is strongly driven by the work of Rao (Sankhya Indian J Stat Series A 44:1-22, 1982) and Stirling (J R Soc Interface 4:707-719, 2007). It is to the credit of Leydesdorff (Scientometr 116:2113-2121, 2018) to have proposed a decisive improvement with regard to an inconsistency in the Rao-Sterling-diversity indicator that Rousseau (Scientometr 116:645-653, 2018) had pointed out. With recourse to Shannon's probabilistically based entropy concept, in this contribution the three components of diversity variety, balance, and disparity are to be reconceptualized as entropy masses that add up to an overall diversity indicator div(e). Diversity can thus be interpreted as the degree of uncertainty or unpredictability. For disparity, for example, the concept of mutual information is used. However, probabilities must be estimated statistically. A basic estimation strategy (cross tables) and a more sophisticated one (parametric statistical model) are presented. This overall probability-theoretical based concept is applied exemplarily to data on research output types of funded research projects in UK that were the subject of the Metric Tide Report (REF 2014) and ex-ante evaluation data of a research funding organization. As expected, research output types depend on the research area, with journal articles having the strongest individual balance among the output types, i.e., being represented in almost all research areas. For the ex-ante evaluation data of 1,221 funded projects the diversity components were statistically estimated. The overall diversity of the projects in terms of entropy is 55.5% of the maximal possible entropy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available