4.7 Article

The negative impact of increasing temperatures on rice yields in southern China

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 820, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153262

Keywords

Climate change; Killing degree days; Rice production; China

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1505605, 2019YFD1002201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of increasing temperatures on rice yields in southern China, finding that early rice is more affected than late rice.
China is the main producer and consumer of rice in the world, and rice is a major staple food grain for more than half of the world's population. Reduced rice yields caused by climate factors not only affect the food security of China, but also has global repercussions. Thus, it is vital to assess the potential impact of climate warming on rice production. Using daily temperature and phenology records of double-cropping rice from agro-meteorological stations in southern China, the influence of increased temperatures on rice yields during the last several decades was investigated. Associated with an increase in average daily mean temperatures by 0.7 degrees C during 2009-2018 relative to 1961-1970, Killing Degree Days (KDD), an indicator for damaging high temperature, for early and late rice increased by 110% and 88.6% respectively. However, the negative influence of KDDs on yields was mainly evident for early rice, because high temperatures occurred frequently during the sensitive grain -filling period; early-rice yields showed a decrease of 8% per 1 degrees C increase in mean growing season air temperature. Late rice yields, on the other hand, were not as negatively influ-enced by increasing temperatures as early rice, because high temperature usually occurred during the vegetative growth stage, which was not so sensitive to high temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available