4.7 Article

Detecting marine pests using environmental DNA and biophysical models

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 816, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151666

Keywords

Marine pest species; Invasive ranges; eDNA; qPCR; Spatial detection limits; Dispersal modelling

Funding

  1. Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions
  2. Parks Victoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spread of marine pests is increasing due to globalization and trade. This study evaluates the invasive ranges of two marine pests using environmental DNA (eDNA) assays and examines the spatial and temporal detection limits of eDNA in different oceanographic conditions. The findings suggest that eDNA signals are likely to be highly localized even in complex marine environments, highlighting the importance of eDNA methods for marine pest surveillance.
The spread of marine pests is occurring at record rates due to globalisation and increasing trade. Environmental DNA (eDNA) is an emerging tool for pest surveillance, allowing for the detection of genetic material shed by organisms into the environment. However, factors influencing the spatial and temporal detection limits of eDNA in marine environments are poorly understood. In this study we use eDNA assays to assess the invasive ranges of two marine pests in south-eastern Australia, the kelp Undaria pinnatifida and the seastar Asterias amurensis. We explored the temporal and spatial detection limits of eDNA under different oceanographic conditions by combining estimates of eDNA decay with biophysical modelling. Positive eDNA detections at several new locations indicate the invasive range of both pest species is likely to be wider than currently assumed. Environmental DNA decay rates were similar for both species, with a decay rate constant of 0.035 h(-1) for U. pinnatifida, and a decay rate constant of 0.041 h(-1) for A. amurensis, resulting in a 57-73% decrease in eDNA concentrations in the first 24 h and decaying beyond the limits of detection after 3-4 days. Biophysical models informed by eDNA decay profiles indicate passive transport of eDNA up to a maximum of 10 to 20 km from its source, with a similar to 90-95% reduction in eDNA concentration within 1-3 km from the source, depending on local oceanography. These models suggest eDNA signals are likely to be highly localised, even in complex marine environments. This was confirmed with spatially replicated eDNA sampling around an established U. pinnatifida population indicating detection limits of similar to 750 m from the source. This study highlights the value of eDNA methods for marine pest surveillance and provides a much-needed description of the spatio-temporal detection limits of eDNA under different oceanographic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available