4.7 Article

Characterising microplastics in shower wastewater with Raman imaging

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 811, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152409

Keywords

Raman imaging; Synthetic fibre; Cotton fibre; Colorant; Algorithm

Funding

  1. CRC CARE
  2. University of Newcastle, Australia
  3. South Australian node of Microscopy Australia at Flinders University, South Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Raman imaging can directly visualize microplastics collected from shower wastewater, distinguish them from background materials, and extract meaningful information for analysis. The technology also presents challenges such as short focusing/working distance.
Microplastics can potentially be released in our daily activities, such as via our showers, as our clothes are made of plastic fibres, and/or cotton fibres. The challenge is how to characterise these microplastics in shower debris. Herewith we employ Raman imaging to directly visualise the microplastics collected from shower wastewater. Raman can map an image from the scanning array that contains a matrix of thousands of spectra, featuring a considerably higher signal noise ratio than that from a single spectrum. The increased signal-noise ratio reduces the complexity of sample preparation. Consequently, after the shower debris was sampled and washed, Raman imaging allowed us to distinguish the microplastic fibres from the background including cotton fibres and dirt aggregates. Interestingly, by adjusting the laser power intensity, the scanning process enabled simultaneous in-situ bleaching of the colorants formulated in the textile fibres and collection of signals. The disadvantage of Raman imaging such as the short focusing/working distance is also presented and discussed. Overall, the Raman imaging can extract meaningful information from the complex shower debris samples to enable analysis of microplastics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available