4.7 Article

Environmental risks of disposable face masks during the pandemic of COVID-19: Challenges and management

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 825, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153880

Keywords

COVID-19; Face mask; Plastic pollution; Microplastics; Toxic chemicals

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877352, 42077227, 42077293]
  2. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine IntelliSense [ZDSYS20200811142605016]
  3. Shenzhen Fundamental Research and Discipline Layout project [JCYJ20180507182227257]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2021A1515010158, 2019QN01L797]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since early 2020, the global consumption of face masks has significantly increased due to the COVID-19 outbreak. However, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the environmental risks associated with face masks and the importance of proper waste management.
Since the COVID-19 outbreak in early 2020, face mask (FM) has been recognized as an effective measure to reduce the infection, increasing its consumption across the world. However, the large amount of at-home FM usage changed traditional medical waste management practices, lack of improper management. Currently, few studies estimate FM consumption at a global scale, not to say a comprehensive investigation on the environmental risks of FM from a life cycle perspective. Therefore, global FM consumption and its associated environmental risks are clarified in the present study. Our result shows that 449.5 billion FMs were consumed from January 2020 to March 2021, with an average of 59.4 FMs per person worldwide. This review also provides a basis to understand the environmental risk of randomly disposed of FM and highlights the urgent requirement for the attention of FMs waste management to prevent pollution in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available